Hey, we get it. However this website is run by and for the community... and it needs ads in order to keep running.
Please disable your adblock on Squidboards, or go premium to hide all advertisements and this notice. Alternatively, this ad may have just failed to load. Woops!
A weapon with unique looks, even if it is functionally the same as another weapon, could still be considered "exclusive." Not to say that I believe that's the case. I wouldn't be surprised if those weapons ended up being functionally unique. I just mean that I haven't seen anything that...
I have to agree with the thought that, considering that these are some the higest level video footage we have available at the time, these videos do belong in this thread. The fact that it will probably change very soon is not all that relevant.
It is a small non-critical bonus as an incentive to buy an official nintendo figurine. It's like getting mad that adult meals at McDonald's don't come with toys.
I think that it is complete enough. I suspect the reason they are handling things the way they are is because they have put too much thought into every element of the game to just let it devolve into something analogous to no items, fox only, final destination matches. I would want every element...
Some focus group somewhere reacted well to it so that's what they went with. I am neither an advertising expert nor part of the demographic those commercials are meant to create interest in, so I am not going to speculate on their efficiency. They are advertising to us in different ways. Not...
I don't know. That is how some people have fun. They look for things to test their skills that will give them an edge. I'm not about to tell them to not do the thing that brings them enjoyment in a game so that I can have more fun.
The thing about the perks in Splatoon is that at least some of them directly affect gameplay. By which I mean, for example, having a larger tank of ink. I know I will want to prioritize something like that before I have enough gear to go for looks and by the time I have good gear to go for looks...
Setnaro X makes a good point. Maybe ending with a question mark rather than an exclamation point would have made it clearer that you don't have them but want them.
Anyway, it shows you were not trying to be deliberately misleading, so no biggie.
Honestly, I don't know if it is viable to attempt to have a scheme to name techniques before any are even discovered. We don't even know what they are going to be!
I suspect that a lot of them will already be discovered by the developers and be named by them.
Everything else will more than...