With the upcoming Splat Fest, I thought now would be as good a time as ever for this topic.
When playing Turf Wars, there is a constant debate in my mind between the two ways to influence the outcome of the game: inking the ground, and preventing the enemy from doing the same.
Weapons such as the Splattershot and Jr. have no trouble surviving in this mode. They can fill both roles. But while there are weapons that can perform well in each area, there are also exceptional cases.
First, there are weapons that excel in killing but not necessarily in inking. These are weapons such as blasters and chargers. These weapons still see play in TW though.
On the other hand are weapons that I'll see very frequently in TW, but disappear outside of this mode. Here I'm referring to the Aerosprays, Nzaps, and Inkbrushes. It's no secret why the people who equipped these weapons made their choice. While they may not be the most reliable for combat, these weapons are excellent at quickly covering ground, and also as support for when combat inevitably occurs.
However, the question I think needs to be discussed is which of these options, if any, should be more heavily favored in weapon selection when playing TW. It's important to identify whether or not the choice of equipment was a factor in a loss or victory. Should players choose to use weapons that can cover as much turf as possible at the expense of combat utility? Or stop enemy aggression from the start, and take advantage of area control and stronger firepower to deny them the ability to recover?
I haven't seen threads like this that analyze TW from a more competitive perspective. I recognize that due to the structure of TW it's inherently anticompetitive, but that doesn't mean that the same rigorous mindset can't still be applied to the mode in order to find a way to minimize variance. A way to think of it would be TW is a game like poker, while ranked modes are similar to games like soccer, the difference being the amount of randomness involved and the uncertainty of the results. You can't get the perfect hand every time in poker, but you can learn statistical analysis and bluffing in order to minimize losses due to randomness.
When playing Turf Wars, there is a constant debate in my mind between the two ways to influence the outcome of the game: inking the ground, and preventing the enemy from doing the same.
Weapons such as the Splattershot and Jr. have no trouble surviving in this mode. They can fill both roles. But while there are weapons that can perform well in each area, there are also exceptional cases.
First, there are weapons that excel in killing but not necessarily in inking. These are weapons such as blasters and chargers. These weapons still see play in TW though.
On the other hand are weapons that I'll see very frequently in TW, but disappear outside of this mode. Here I'm referring to the Aerosprays, Nzaps, and Inkbrushes. It's no secret why the people who equipped these weapons made their choice. While they may not be the most reliable for combat, these weapons are excellent at quickly covering ground, and also as support for when combat inevitably occurs.
However, the question I think needs to be discussed is which of these options, if any, should be more heavily favored in weapon selection when playing TW. It's important to identify whether or not the choice of equipment was a factor in a loss or victory. Should players choose to use weapons that can cover as much turf as possible at the expense of combat utility? Or stop enemy aggression from the start, and take advantage of area control and stronger firepower to deny them the ability to recover?
I haven't seen threads like this that analyze TW from a more competitive perspective. I recognize that due to the structure of TW it's inherently anticompetitive, but that doesn't mean that the same rigorous mindset can't still be applied to the mode in order to find a way to minimize variance. A way to think of it would be TW is a game like poker, while ranked modes are similar to games like soccer, the difference being the amount of randomness involved and the uncertainty of the results. You can't get the perfect hand every time in poker, but you can learn statistical analysis and bluffing in order to minimize losses due to randomness.