BooDestroyer
Full Squid
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2017
- Messages
- 51
- NNID
- BooDestroyer
I still can't help but feel that the intent behind Splatoon 2's story was to generate drama and controversy among the fanbase. Like it's all some kind of conspiracy from Nintendo against the fans.
But let's be realistic here.
Nintendo knows better than to make it look like it was all OUR fault. Splatfests were a fun thing for everyone, and then it would suddenly look like a terrible thing now? Doesn't sound right at all. They would not shaft them just because of the otherwise secondary 1P mode either.
Seriously, there's no way Nintendo would go out of their way to "punish" the fans after how much fun we had with the Splatfests (which I myself barely participated in).
At what point in development was the story added this time? Before or after the last Splatfest? It doesn't take a lot of work to get more of those going, nor does it distract from the second game's development. It just couldn't be THAT late in 2's development, especially when a similar mode was already present in the first game.
But I'm still holding onto the theory that there's a new group in town that's "fresh" with everyone at this point, giving announcements. A Splatoon 2 Direct later should bring more into the fray.
Keep in mind that the Squid Sisters were first revealed in a Splatoon 1 Direct a mere few weeks before that released. (It's as if they were initially planned to be not that important)
Bottom line: It just doesn't make sense for it to go from "Thanks for the Splatfests, everyone!" to "Look what you fools did to Callie!" It just makes it look like a slap - no, a punch - in our faces. On a scale of 1 to 10, how aware are Nintendo of the controversy that the 1P mode trailer alone just instigated? They thank and congratulate us for participating in Splatfests, but now they treat us like morons for it?
Is it really all our fault things turned out the way they did? Or should I just lose the tinfoil hat?
But let's be realistic here.
Nintendo knows better than to make it look like it was all OUR fault. Splatfests were a fun thing for everyone, and then it would suddenly look like a terrible thing now? Doesn't sound right at all. They would not shaft them just because of the otherwise secondary 1P mode either.
Seriously, there's no way Nintendo would go out of their way to "punish" the fans after how much fun we had with the Splatfests (which I myself barely participated in).
At what point in development was the story added this time? Before or after the last Splatfest? It doesn't take a lot of work to get more of those going, nor does it distract from the second game's development. It just couldn't be THAT late in 2's development, especially when a similar mode was already present in the first game.
But I'm still holding onto the theory that there's a new group in town that's "fresh" with everyone at this point, giving announcements. A Splatoon 2 Direct later should bring more into the fray.
Keep in mind that the Squid Sisters were first revealed in a Splatoon 1 Direct a mere few weeks before that released. (It's as if they were initially planned to be not that important)
Bottom line: It just doesn't make sense for it to go from "Thanks for the Splatfests, everyone!" to "Look what you fools did to Callie!" It just makes it look like a slap - no, a punch - in our faces. On a scale of 1 to 10, how aware are Nintendo of the controversy that the 1P mode trailer alone just instigated? They thank and congratulate us for participating in Splatfests, but now they treat us like morons for it?
Is it really all our fault things turned out the way they did? Or should I just lose the tinfoil hat?
Last edited: