Flying_Tortoise
Sushi Chef
^
plus if you have 7 players you could just find one more and split into 2 teams, and still scrimmage each other. Then everyone can be playing.
We honestly shouldn't form a competitive meta around the idea of allowing more people the chance to play, because they could just find another team that needs another member (which there most likely will be).
Now if we were saying we want to make a meta around the idea of having constant variety, where teams can swap in their members for more strategy. Then that makes more sense. I still wouldn't like it and I'd argue against it tbh, but it makes more sense.
What I was hoping for is a meta that encourages adaption from the teams and comebacks being a result of the teams skill to comeup with a counterattack, noticing players' tendencies. To me that is a more respectable and hype meta, where players can say "they brought it back because they are good", not "they brought it back because they put in new players how could counter it".
But I am just one person and if there is another side to the argument then of course I'd like to hear it. Debates will lead to a better meta than any one person can think of.
plus if you have 7 players you could just find one more and split into 2 teams, and still scrimmage each other. Then everyone can be playing.
We honestly shouldn't form a competitive meta around the idea of allowing more people the chance to play, because they could just find another team that needs another member (which there most likely will be).
Now if we were saying we want to make a meta around the idea of having constant variety, where teams can swap in their members for more strategy. Then that makes more sense. I still wouldn't like it and I'd argue against it tbh, but it makes more sense.
What I was hoping for is a meta that encourages adaption from the teams and comebacks being a result of the teams skill to comeup with a counterattack, noticing players' tendencies. To me that is a more respectable and hype meta, where players can say "they brought it back because they are good", not "they brought it back because they put in new players how could counter it".
But I am just one person and if there is another side to the argument then of course I'd like to hear it. Debates will lead to a better meta than any one person can think of.