All those options leave her extremely vulnerable, they were already aiming and firing at her. Yeah she could have tried to get away, with the 95% she's going to be fired at the whole time and likely die. Any escape by her would have been free damage from the other team, resulting in her death.
Honestly, the biggest mistake was cornering herself like that. She had a charge shot behind her to the left on an advantageous point (which it was smart to avoid by by and a roller + splattershot jr combo coming down the ramp, once the roller started flinging there wasn't much else she could have done. The one thing we aren't sure of yet is the bubble shield, does it have HP or is it a timed invincibility state? Knowing which would indicate if making a last stand would be worth it or not. Only time will tell...
I'd assume that its time-based. I haven't seen any footage yet that implies it has any sort of health gauge.
For now I'm assuming the same, however hidden HP values could very well exist and may effect the rate of bubble decay.
Very true. Though I feel like a timer and hidden HP would make the bubble shield too weak to be viable.
The player is either a member of the staff, or he's a QA tester. He's had dozens if not hundreds of hours put into the game. You're comparing them to people who played less than 3 (most playing less than 1).
Just because you have dozens or hundreds of hours into a game doesn't mean you'll necessarily be good. I know people that have been playing Smash for over half a decade and still struggle with basic stuff.
Can confirm. Have played Smash since 2009. Above average, but no where near as good as I should be after 6 years.
I really wanna see how you play since you seem to have this diverse approach to arena TPS.
If you had to create video to advertise your game, would you use footage from an average QA player or from the one that has a good handle on the game? As seen in the charger footage, the entire other team huddled together in the middle of the map. At one point 2 were standing in a row as he was shooting at them over and over.
Oh I'm not arguing with any of this. Obviously what is perceived as high level play won't be high level play in the future. Though that doesn't mean it doesn't make the current high level play high level. It's just not evolved yet.
Yeah I noticed this as well. Great thing to commit to memory.
I play a little more aggressively. Heavy focus on slaying and rotation after establishing map control. I watch the map a lot and rotate over to assist teammates. Kind of Halo-esque I guess
Hmmm, I guess I just have to see how you play then, since that's how I've been seeing myself and many others play as well.
This is what I'm thinking. Even if it's minor (10%), it means firing at someone bubbled is viable, since you can make it disappear sooner. We just can't test it unfortunately. I'll assume it's only a timer right now, but I'm not writing off it has some mechanic related to receiving damage while bubbled. You can keep them pushed back physically, so there's at least that.