They will if money's involved. They know the Male Inkling got ignored for the most part and he's a last minute decision. And the development team is smaller, and that means less budget which means less features to add post launch.
It most certainly was not ignored. Yes, it wasn't as popular, but that in no way is a finite reason to completely remove any ability to even create a male Octoling. Dev teams being smaller does not instantly mean less budget btw, even if it is a smaller budget creating a male octoling would not put them in the hole. That's what being paid DLC would alleviate. So, uhm, by less features do you mean having weapons to release every week and constant gear additions? Just curious. If the dev team is as small as you're making it seem, it's incredible that their capable of as much content as they've already given us.
"But then why waste money on a male character? The female will be used more!" Is the thought here. So are you going to try and convince me that the male will be used to nearly the same degree as the female, making the development costs worth it? The Inklings proved that won't be the case, so why spend any more money than they already have? Also, female locked races have been a thing in games.
I get your thoughts on the matter, you made it very clear. I'm not going to convince you of an unseen variable, since, it's completely impossible to do. But to sit here and act like the male Octoling won't get used is ridiculous. Maybe not to the same degree as the female, but it will be used, and it will give male players that want to portray such in game the satisfaction they deserve. Yea, female specific classes/races have been used in other games, but that has nothing to do with this. I mean, other than using irrelevant outside instances to back your argument.
Nintendo is a business, first and foremost. They have always thought about the long term and do not like to spend large amounts of money on things that are not hardware. This hasn't changed very much for years. They are not broke, but they are not going to spend extra money on something that would be played by a fraction of the players.
Alright, I'm glad I get the chance to approach this, since this will be a juicy portion of my reply. . . You're right, they are a business. With that said, I'm getting pretty tired of that being the go to statement. They are a business that makes it their utmost priority to please their fans. This would be no different. I'm glad you brought up the "large amounts of money on things that are not hardware" though because, let's apply that to Smash Bros. . . They have given constant DLC that is not hardware for a while now. Characters, stages, mii costumes etc. some of which no one ever uses and never intends to use (namely mii costumes).These are just as difficult if not more difficult to create due to hitboxes, stun animations, etc. Yet, they're going to be dropping 3 more maybe even 6 on us in the near future. Should they apply the same "well if they're not gonna use this character why add it" mindset? Especially in a game that is entirely dependent on movesets, lag time, hitboxes, etc. The ballot is a prime example of this. Just because a character is popular, doesn't mean it will be good. If it's not good, it won't be used. That is the way of Smash Bros, but they will develop these characters anyways because they answered to their fanbase. Ya know, pleasing their fans. They are spending extra money on something that may be played by a fraction of the players as we speak. So, I'm not sure how solid that argument is.
The entire reason the Octolings are even wanted is due to their appearance. We know what the girls look like and we only have a basic idea on what the males looks like in the Sunken Scroll, but do not actually appear in game. Why are you expecting something that didn't even appear in the single player at all?
Who said I was expecting anything? I simply gave a logical reasoning as to what's "taking so long". It would make sense to have them if they are to become playable so that the players can choose whatever gender of whichever race they want. I am not expecting male Octolings to be playable, I'm not even really expecting female Octolings to be playable. I simply gave a possibility as to what is going on right now.
Too late. They already have due to them not announcing anything to get really excited over in the past few weeks.
Yet again another go to statement. . . They don't have to keep us on a constant hype train ya know. They don't have to constantly announce things every week and a half. That's what made E3 so lackluster was they spent all of 2014 selling all the games they could have shown at E3. I'm sure they've noticed this and have taken heed to it. I see this mindset no longer applies to just the Pokemon fanbase now, and it's making me wonder why people feel the need to constantly have something huge on their plate.
Again, If you would read my last thought on my post you'd find I do want them too, but It doesn't look likely is all I'm trying to say. I'm preparing the bunkers in case they reveal it's female only.
I read it, and I in no way said you didn't want them in the game. Didn't even imply it. I simply presented a counter argument. All I'm trying to say is that leaving a portion of their male fanbase out in the rain, no matter how large or small it may be, would be a dumb move on their part. I'm not preparing for anything personally. And I see you've already set your mind on one outcome despite being passive aggressive in saying you wouldn't mind males being in there. If your mind is set on Females being the only playable octolings and are showing no signs of wavering then there is no point in continuing this "debate".