Try a little harder if you're going to sockpuppet, because this is REALLY obvious. As it stands, for an "adult" you sure are getting worked up about a mode in a video game, on top of ignoring even the most polite dissent shown in this thread. This is not a hill worth dying for.
Lol, I work too. Just said it's convenient you both work shifts most people don't.
A distressingly common problem in this day and age.
Well you could try to be nicer to people. You kind of are... well... a jerk to a lot of people. I know you say it's criticism but you criticize everything everyone says and I can understand why people get fed up with this, myself included. Maybe if you would just lay low and stop looking down at everyone as stupid inferior specimens then there would be less drama. Just try being nice for once. It wouldn't kill you, would it?
Which totally defeats the purpose of feedback? We're just to accept everything at face value and pretend that these cases don't cause dissatisfaction? Can I deal with time restraints? Sure, but to be limited to almost every other 4 days? That's ridiculous is really all I'm saying. That's way too scarce for an entire game mode and I've only stated that I personally think it should change.
No, you're not to just "accept it". But, there's a difference in "accepting it" and "understanding it". You can be dissatisfied with something, but if there's a logical reason behind it, then despite being dissatisfied, you can at least understand why. But that does not seem to be what you're doing at all.
You did see the part where he opened the thread with "If I knew this beforehand I wouldn't have bought it", right? I'll admit to jumping the gun but the tone's been set from the start.
Attacks and criticisms? You guys have offered barely any constructive and objective criticisms for improvements to the game and are more concerned with bashing one's preferences as "unimportant" (at least that's implied by the energy here) and are more concerned with the style of presentation of other's thoughts than the actual topic itself. A pity party? If that's what it's called then so be it. Nintendo should feel bad for those of us that are part of the upset consumer base here. Grizzco should be available more often than every other day at strange intervals. I could see him going down maybe once a week for 2 or 3 hours but this right now is simply too much.
I do understand the reasoning such as gear and other guesses as well. I see the logic behind what the main idea was. I just highly disagree with all of that logic. My reason for disagreeing to the original logic is because I see it to be even more logical to just leave it open all the time. This is more a topic of uncentered debate rather than it is a mutual agreement or a disagreement. I disagree with the original logic of implementing these time restraints entirely. I agree that the gear and said stuff is a point to be made, but it'll never move where I stand on just having it available. If we really want to boil this down and cool this thread off. May I then suggest that everything remains the same as it stands right now in the game (you're only able to get the gear and rewards on the original intended times), but the only exception is that Salmon Run stays open permanently just for the sake of playing it? On what would be normal down times, make it available just for the simplest sake of playing the mode for fun. I've separated the arguments that tie gear involved with the mode. A counter reason to that? I doubt I'll be convinced to believe the logic is reasonable. Can we just agree with this much? Simple availability and no rewards? At least that bare minimum can't possibly warrant a complaint. We have people who want to play the mode and can't. I fail to see the logic in even merely criticizing those who can't play; "You can't play the game, so you just have to deal with reasons "A" and "B" and stop complaining." Just give the fans what they want. It's not like it really affects the counter. This isn't even really about recognizing reasoning or trying to understand Nintendo's decision in the time restraints. This is just fans letting them know they want more. It diminishes nothing else about the game. We could discuss reasons as to why and why not, but boiling it down even more? This is just that. Fans wanting more of something they enjoy. Usually with posts with suggestions, they're valid arguments to be made that could diminish the other party such as weapon buffs etc. This isn't that topic. We're not looking to diminish the game for anyone. It's an easy situation that can be addressed to satisfy customers without even phasing the other. Was the tone this whole discussion tipped over a bit? Sure. That's the fire we need to set moods. It's not like I came on here cussing up a storm and providing no reasoning whatsoever other than to just cuss a game out. I explained why, I set a firm tone, and I laid my ideas in the ring.
"You guys"? I have no dog in this fight. I agree the time wall was a really dumb idea, but I understand the reasoning behind it, and thus won't ever be writing a thread like this. And it's more than just the rewards I'm sure.
They are not the same person. I also have a friend who works 12 hour shifts Mon - Thurs every week. This is not uncommon. Please don't attack other forum members over genuine complaints.
The way it works is you get into a lobby, either one you create or you join with a friend. If it's just you and one friend, the lobby host will then recruit two random players to join the lobby. The same applies if you have three people, only now you obviously only recruit one random person. So you can play with your friends just fine in Salmon Run.
That number is a little insane for a week. But I see where you are going I like this take on what Salmon run could provide.
