StarHunter789
Pro Squid
I think if they would have clothes, Laylee would have some sort of scarf and Yooka would have pants and a necklace of some type, sort of like Banjo's but a different style.Yooka needs some type of attire.
I think if they would have clothes, Laylee would have some sort of scarf and Yooka would have pants and a necklace of some type, sort of like Banjo's but a different style.Yooka needs some type of attire.
Genders are not confirmed.I personally like Yooka and Laylee clothless. I don't really agree with the idea that they gain anything from clothes. I DO think that Laylee should be a tad more recognizable as female, though. Which is easy enough- just shrink the nose a bit, maybe give some slight eyelashes. That's about it. Yooka looks more the female than Laylee (which, to be honest, is kinda what I was hoping for initially, but no big deal).
Please elaborate. On Playtonic's Kickstarter page, Yooka and Laylee are referred to as a "bloke" and "lady-bat", respectively. If there is another source from the developers that is more recent and states that the genders are not confirmed, then I'd like to see it.Genders are not confirmed.
Yes, but on twitter they stated exactly my point: the genders aren't actually confirmed. I'll edit in a link if I can.Please elaborate. On Playtonic's Kickstarter page, Yooka and Laylee are referred to as a "bloke" and "lady-bat", respectively. If there is another source from the developers that is more recent and states that the genders are not confirmed, then I'd like to see it.
Well that is how I feel about society in general and the government, not trusting the appearance that is. I suppose we can say that while it seems they have confirmed the genders on Kickstarter, there is the possibility they could change since the group of developers seems pretty laid back. However, I wouldn't bet on them changing that particular detail at this point.Yes, but on twitter they stated exactly my point: the genders aren't actually confirmed. I'll edit in a link if I can.
I'm actually not sure if this is more recent, but look at the abundance of jokes and puns on their kickstarter and playtonic games page. I wouldn't trust what you see. :p
Laylee is fine the way she is. The fact she doesn't have the generic traits often attributed to female characters (like lipstick, pink decorations, etc) is a great thing. Her appearance isn't defined by her gender. I also like that Yooka looks a tad feminine, even though he is (supposedly) male. Diversity is always a good thing.I personally like Yooka and Laylee clothless. I don't really agree with the idea that they gain anything from clothes. I DO think that Laylee should be a tad more recognizable as female, though. Which is easy enough- just shrink the nose a bit, maybe give some slight eyelashes. That's about it. Yooka looks more the female than Laylee (which, to be honest, is kinda what I was hoping for initially, but no big deal).
Honestly, I don't understand what the problem you have is. There's nothing really "bad" about Steam...(relatively) Terrible news! I just received a response from a Playtonic representative to a question I previously asked on Kickstarter. Since I had pledged enough to receive a physical PC copy of the game, my question was if the physical PC version would be DRM-free or if it would require Steam. I'm glad that I asked, because this fear of mine has ended up coming true. Here is Playtonic's emailed response:
(snip)
I am tremendously disappointed about this, as I hoped that this independent team of developers would have a passion for the traditional economics of video games. It is possible that I have a degree of ignorance regarding what it takes to develop and publish games, so there may be some hurdles that I don't understand to making games DRM-free, but it is still my preference to be able to actually own my own games and not be required to activate them over the Internet. I will definitely be reducing my pledge amount, if not canceling it altogether, and I won't be getting a PC version of the game unless/until a DRM-free version is released. I may consider a console version, but I am not entirely sure.
It's more the principle of it than anything. I prefer to actually own something that I paid for, like the "old days" when a game cartridge/floppy was your game, no Internet connection or online account required. I've used Steam in the past, and I think that its original intended purpose is fine. It makes sense for any developer including Valve to have their own platform for their own games which they developed. The problem I have is when the platform becomes a third-party DRM platform, and anyone can make games that must be activated through said platform. Basically it is effectively eliminating true ownership of consumers' individually purchased games by forcing "online activation".Honestly, I don't understand what the problem you have is. There's nothing really "bad" about Steam...
Edit: Far less people use DRM-Free websites to buy games from, so I'm assuming their decision was based financially.