PiyozR
Senior Squid
The PDF has been updated. Link is in the sig.
Lmao, sorry for the bad timing, man.You all just had to have all this on the one night this year that I went out to ripped with my friends, didn't you?
Oh crap, I forgot about that anemone bit! What was it again? I added in your text-related vocab, but what geography did you suggest?Nice update! Although I see no geography or text-related new vocabulary. Was it a slip or were they not good enough for you? Das rood, man, you're going to make me cry. Which reminds me, did you miss my update on anemones? You never answered after the last time I got back to you about that.
Inklings don't bother much with honorifics. The politest they will be is to use kaie, sukaie, žegai and sužegai appropriately.(Were there honorifics in Inkling? I swear I remember there being some sort of honorifics but I can't find 'em.)
I hardly even looked at the geometry vocab when I added it months ago. Is it even worth adding more?Edit: I see there's no word for "polygon" or "polyhedron" themselves despite the nifty naming system for shapes. Since polygons are named [number of sides] + {shi}, and polyhedrons are named [number of sides per face] + {metái}, I'm going to suggest to call them {ómoshi} for "polygon" (from {ómo} "some") and... just {metái} for "polyhedron" (I would've liked to use just {shi} for "polygon" but I think it's too short).
{tairo} is "thing/stuff"Also, there's no word for "thing/stuff".
There's a word for "low" as in "downward" or "deep" in {dáduše}. Do you mean "low" as in "less in magnitude/quantity"?...And I'm going to add {hudómo} for "low", from {hudó} "less/fewer" and {ómo} "some".
I'm just adding the 2 generic words of "shape with a certain number of sides" or "polygon" and "shape with a certain number of faces" or "polyhedron"; it seems stupid to speak of stuff if we can't say what kind of stuff they are. Almost like having words for "apple", "strawberry", "pear", "peach", ... but having no word for "fruit".I hardly even looked at the geometry vocab when I added it months ago. Is it even worth adding more?
See, this is why I need to post somewhere where people can point at my mistakes. I'm SO good at missing things that are there.{tairo} is "thing/stuff"
Yeah, that's exactly what I meant, sorry for not specifying.There's a word for "low" as in "downward" or "deep" in {dáduše}. Do you mean "low" as in "less in magnitude/quantity"?
The whole list of vocabulary I've ever suggested (minus the one you already added to the pdf) in this thread is here:Oh crap, I forgot about that anemone bit! What was it again? I added in your text-related vocab, but what geography did you suggest?
I was joking with the birthday stuff, with the font being kinda like a present... I was split between that and "Merry Christmas". Should've gone with "Merry Christmas".And happy birthday Piyoz (if it's your birthday)!
NOICE!Which, yes, means that I've been able to work up an OpenType font with ligature mechanics.
This is one of the reasons my friend created the romanization that he did. The romanization for each inkling letter is distinct. On my sheet, it's the rightmost one. I've personally dubbed it “Pika Roman”.To distinguish between {boi} written with {bo} and {i} or with {boi} I've worked a workaround: all glyphs that can be the ending part of another glyph accept a single quote before them too. For example, {boi} in 2 characters should be written {bo'i} and {anéna} should be written {a'nena}; the first detects the ligatures {bo} and {'i} (which is the same as just {i}, and {í}) and the second one detects the ligatures {a}, {'ne}, and {na}.
Ugh… Right after whatever happened yesterday to break X11 on my virtual machine. Figures.The font doesn't work in most of Windows applications. A quick Google Search confirmed me that many don't even support it (Microsoft Word 2007 doesn't support it at all, and you must delve into Microsoft Word 2010's advanced configuration to enable ligatures, and even though LibreOffice's Writer supports in in Linux and Mac, the Windows version doesn't). Photoshop CS6 should be compatible, but I haven't yet figured out how. For now, if you want to write docs I'd recommend using Linux or Mac.
It seems to me all you're missing is a pretty simple @font-face directive in your stylesheet. I'll develop one and post it in here later so anybody can use it. :)For now, the blog can only be seen with the font installed, but I want to at least make it look like this for chrome users. Those who want to help me on that will have to wait before installing the font, and we'll continue the conversation through PM so as not to clutter this thread.
That would be pretty rad! I did play with different @font-face configurations, but none worked and it was late so I kinda just removed it.It seems to me all you're missing is a pretty simple @font-face directive in your stylesheet. I'll develop one and post it in here later so anybody can use it. :)
@font-face {
font-family: "ArowanaSans";
font-style: normal;
font-weight: normal;
src: local("ArowanaSans"), url("http://static.tumblr.com/wiwrqlp/AKDo7ndya/arowanasans.otf");
}
Basically, it's complaining that tumblr's server didn't say that it was okay to use the file on a different website.Font from origin 'http://static.tumblr.com' has been blocked from loading by Cross-Origin Resource Sharing policy: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. Origin 'http://localhost' is therefore not allowed access.
Honestly I don't have time to deal with this, not before finals. Putting a link to my Google Drive works enough for me.Font from origin 'http://static.tumblr.com' has been blocked from loading by Cross-Origin Resource Sharing policy: No 'Access-Control-Allow-Origin' header is present on the requested resource. Origin 'http://gehif-arit.tumblr.com' is therefore not allowed access.
No, not difficult. Just immensely time-consuming. Everything from page eleven to forty-three (plus some other spots) would have to be shifted around and retyped. That's easily several weeks of word-by-word editing done by hand.My vote is on restructuring the PDF. I don't think it would be that terribly difficult to update after the initial restructuring. Like I said before I'm willing to help sort everything out if it's too much work to do alone
I don't think the PDF is fine like it is, although it's not catastrophic. Yet. If it's going to keep growing, maybe we'll reach a point it'll be unbearable and then regret will happen.This puts me in an interesting dilemma. Do I leave the PDF as it is, letting people find what they need by Ctrl+Fing around, or do go through the effort of uprooting everything to organize every word into an easier and more logical sense of order? That's a remarkable amount of time for such little reward. All the content's already there. Yet it's so random and haphazard that it's an eyesore to sift through.
What do you guys think? Do you think the PDF is fine like it is? Or should I overhaul it for clarity, ease of use and professionalism? I can't decide!
Where did you try to get it working? Windows? Which version? What program? To know what I should test for.I tried downloading and installing the Arowana Sans. I can't get it working.